The words "qualified" and "experienced" only dance around the real requirement for high office which is capability. Obama isn't just inexperienced and unqualified to be president but also terminally incapable. In other words, he never will be up to the job. If he had any talent for leadership at all, it would have shown itself by now.
Sarah Palin, on the other hand, was showing leadership early as a high school athlete, and demonstrating good judgement as Mayor of her hometown.
It is actually funny that Obama tries to forget that she isn't a small town mayor any longer, but a sitting governor making major decisions. Next to her, he looks like a child bragging about how long he can hold his breath.

I hope they point out that Obama's whole time as US Senator has been spent running for POTUS. He's not even qualified to be a Senator. Also why is the Obama camp trying to say he is more qualified than Palin anyway? He is not running for VEEP. She is a hypothetical heartbeat away from POTUS but we would be electing him to be that.

I would rather have an inexperienced Govenor, than an inexperienced Senator, in the Oval Office. If more people had of taken civil/social studies, in school, they'd know the difference between a Govenor/Senator. Being a great orator does not make for a great President. The world is too scary for someone unproven. BTW...I have NEVER heard/seen more sexist comments about a candidate.
Go, Sarah!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!